Pages

Monday, May 31, 2010

ISRAEL ENDANGERS U.S. ALL: Flotilla Activists Massacred

DIE, ISRAEL


"Enough" in Hebrew is Die.

Beyond breathtaking, the news this morning from International Waters off Gaza that the Israeli Defense Forces have boarded and opened fire on ships sailing under white flags to Gaza with humanitarian aid and at least one Nobel Peace Prize winner and one Holocaust survivor on board.

IF one doesn't believe Israel is being run by fundamentalist idiots, then one must accept that this morning's action against the Peace Flotilla is utterly intentional. Mister Bates, for one, no longer gives a shit as to the consequences for Israel. Check with Mister Bates in a few days and he may well join the chorus that says: Israel must go. For now, what matters is what how it affects Mister Bates himself. His life (short). His family (gay). His city (NYC). His country (US).

Israel is signing not just its own death warrant, but bringing the justifiable wrath of the world down on the U.S.

NETANYAHU MUST BE BANNED FROM AMERICA. NO VISIT ON THURSDAY. NO VISIT EVER.


And SCREW anyone who says opposing Israel's racist military state is anti-Semitism. That one has FINALLY played itself out.

Saturday, May 29, 2010

FROM BP TO ABC: Brits LOVE a Top Kill



WARNING TO SECULAR FANS: TIME OUT FROM REALITY.


Pentecost 2010. Which 'melodious sonnet sung by flaming tongues above' is the Archbitchup of Canterbury singing now? Let me splain.

His Grace Lord Rowan Williams Archbishop of Canterbury has released a 'Pentecost Letter to the Anglican Communion,' a sort of BP style Top Kill attempt to stop the bleeding in the Anglican Communion—and save that valuable bloodline in the process. And surprise, surprise, Rowan's letter turns out to be no Top Kill, but more of a global Buzz Kill.

The letter intended to be an explanation of the 'painful divisions' in the worldwide Communion of 77 million Anglicans, but is in fact a photo-realist portrait of the painful divisions in his own supposedly formidable mind. And children of the Lord, that mind is one HOT MESS.

The Presenting Issue

That's Episcopalian for finger-in-the-eye. Anyway. After 30+ years of kissing some mighty bony Republipalian and angly Anglican ass, The Episcopal Church has FINALLY decided—to paraphrase Judy Garland in The Good Ole Summertime—

"we don't care,
we don't care,
when it comes to happiness
we'll have our share.
Don't try to rearrange us,
there's nothing can change us,
cause we do-on't ca-areeee."



The Episcopal Church is Feeling No Pain

The Episcopal Church finally got the sin of exclusion off its back and said we're going to live the abundant life our savior redeemed us for. We're gonna be marrying gays, real soon. And in the meantime, we're going to consecrate open queers. And just to prove it, Canon Mary Glasspool, longtime pet lesbian of the East Coast Episcopalian elite, has been elected and consecrated a bishop in God's one holy and apostolic church, Los Angeles chapter.

Word is the Episcopal Bishop of Massachusetts Tom Shaw has authorized priests in his diocese to go ahead and marry all those queers who keep crowding up the aisles of the puritan commonwealth. Meanwhile, Blessed V. Gene Robinson, Episcopal Bishop of New Hampshire, in a photo from a luncheon for his new fellow bishop Mary of Hollywood, had a look of serene relief on his face that hasn't been there since his well-attended but still lonely consecration in 2003. (What the children of God owe that man is incalculable.)


U.S. Still to Pay for Communion


What is demonstrably painful is watching Rowan contort like a worm in hot ashes over how to kick the U.S. out but NOT our checkbooks. See: Estimates say from 40%-80% of the budget of the Anglican Communion comes out of American pockets. Even at the low end, American dollars are absolutely essential to... for one thing, salaries of a great many people who wait on His Grace and Mrs. Williams in Lambeth Palace, not to mention the entire concept of the Anglican Communion as a global missional enterprise. You see, children, whatever the stock market says, God's a traditionalist and God STILL trusts in the Yankee dollar.

And in the "our own worst enemies file" it's worth mentioning that a great many American bishops love nothing so much as playing Bishop Bountiful in Anglican Africans and Indians. They adore the way the little children are suffered to come unto them, how they leap and sing and smile big as watermelons. So much nicer than the surly entitled poor back home in...Boston, Bishop Shaw? New York City, Bishop Roskam? But in truth, why should anybody complain about our bishops enjoying a little God-playing time? After all, it's U.S. who pays for it.

With his Pentecost Letter Rowan has provided The Episcopal Church with the logic we need to, cough, cough, reduce our commitment. Rowan says the Communion needs to exclude Episcopalians from "representative" bodies of the Communion because our apostasy of "seeking and serving Christ in ALL persons" trespasses the Anglican Communion's self-conception of diversity. (Like THEY get to say what diversity is. Diversity is self-defining and the number one definition is that diversity has NO LIMITS.)

Of course, it's our money that pays for all these "representative" Anglican bodies to fly, lodge, dine, drink, meet, greet and REPRESENT. So, Rowan proposes Episcopalians still go, as consultants (viz. authorized signers) not representatives. U.S. pays for no says.

Objecting "The Least Christian" Thing U.S. Could Do

That's right. Rowan has the (tiny) cujones to say if we object to our own marginalization we should still pay for it. But—and here is where the actual Christianity comes in—The Episcopal Church has traveled a true via dolorosa to this point before finally surrendering to God's will and affirming that simplest and hardest of Christian truths: "we are one." So, which is more Christian, to pay for putting "the limits of diversity" (a fave Rowan phrase) into the mouth of Christ?

That Rowan, What Will He Say Next?

In the course of his jam-packed and fun-filled Pentecost Letter, the Archbishop generously lards in some of his prize concepts of exclusion developed over, lo, these ten plus years of his ascendancy. For instance, he starts the whole thing by explaining Pentecost to the state university crowd, not as the ignition of the firy empowerment of Christ's people which less august thinkers might call it, but as a deeply humbling permission to call God "Abba, Father." Women, gays and just about anybody with a modern brain in the Church of England, including the present Queen, might read this with pause. See, Rowan's day job is running that bastion of gender strait-jacketing, the Church of England. Most of us, even Episcopalians, are able to accept that, for now at least, we move and have our being in a church that is a hierarchy. But many, even in Tory Britain, had hoped we'd put paid to the church of patriarchy. Not, it seems, Sasquatch, uh, Rowan Williams.

Rowan Likes His World Neatly Divided

Again, in his typically broody letter—is it really just a Welsh thang?—Rowan reiterates his segregation of the world into developing vs. modern. He thinks the "rapidity of change" in the modern West, or North, or whatever we are, is somehow bypassing the developing world. When he says, "the witness in the communion of Christians from the developing world is more articulate and creative than ever," listen close and you'll feel the undertow. Brits of Rowan's ilk love nothing so much as saying one thing to mean the opposite, i.e. "articulate" really means "loud," and "creative" really means "destructive." Take note, Orthodoxhunds.

Rowan goes on to explain that topics confronting us in the West—sexuality, bio-ethics, for instance—aren't current in those 'creative' developing nations. WTF? Rowan? Where the HELL have you been? Can't someone, maybe Wifey, give you the highlights from the papers?

The revolution in sexual politics is global. The international outcry over Uganda's death penalty law for gays? The gay couple imprisoned in Malawi for 14 years of hard labor for becoming "engaged" and celebrating it publicly? The ongoing public torture and murder of gays in Iran, Iraq, Egypt, etc.? And "bio-ethics" is, what, too technical for Africans? Nothing for them to get their nappy heads upset over? Wow. The imperial patriarchal condescension of Rowan is something out of ... not even the 19th century. This is 18th century George III and Marie Antoinette stuff. Both lost their heads. And we in America, in case you forgot Rowan, set ourselves FREE.

Words Matter—Rowan and Pat Separated At Ordination

Rowan, in a faux bow to the tortured and tortuous, deliberate and almost endless process whereby The Episcopal Church concluded on full inclusion of LGBT people in the life of the Body of Christ, says we did it "in conscience." Seems respectful, right? But he's saying we decided it for ourselves, that the Holy Spirit had and has nothing to do with where we are as a church on this. He's saying he doesn't believe the The Episcopal Church's discernment of its future was or is sacramental. (Secular readers, believe it or not this parsing matters to us church folk; and you can bet it matters to Rowan the Wise.) He's saying we're apostates, just like the orthodoxhunds do. You can say it fancy or not, but on this matter, Rowan Williams is Pat Robertson in a collar and an accent.

Cost Analysis

Rowan tells us that Episcoplians are still Anglicans but we can't be OUT in the Communion's meeting. This is don't-bring-your-lover-to-Christmas-Dinner closeting. It's DADT on a global, ecclesiastical scale. Meanwhile, his concern over ecumenical efforts seems positively quaint, doesn't it? While the Bishop of Rome, a.k.a. Pope Bentdick, is openly trying to pick off the Cranklicans who form Rowan's last best hope for the Communion.

And Rowan justifies the demotion of Episcopalians by saying that "[they must pay] a cost when they move away from what is recognizable and acceptable within the Communion." (Acceptable?! You can't make this shit up.)

Oh, really? We have to pay to stay in the closet? To hover in the background and sign the checks and credit card receipts? I'm feeling a very house-nun role coming on.

Well, recognize this: American Episcopalians would do well to acknowledge the holy fire in their bellies and stop begging for the privilege of addressing the father personally.

If you really want think about what it costs to be a real Christian, Rowan, try the old AFRICAN and AMERICAN gospel song that the late great Mahalia Jackson used to sing:

It don't cost very much.
Just to leave a gentle touch.
Or to give a glass of water
to a pilgrim in need of such.

Oh, you may not be an angel,
and you may not go to church,
but the good that you do
will come on back to you.

And it don't cost very much.


ALLELUIA. Thanks be to God for The Episcopal Church. ALLELUIA.

Thursday, May 13, 2010

SHWEW, THAT WAS CLOSE: Cagie Kagan Is Straight!


MISTER BATES was flooded with relief to read, according to SC nominee Elana Kagan's college roomie, "She's straight!" No matter that a buddy of Mister Bates immediately claimed that "if she's not a lesbian, Liberace was a top!"

And the relief just spreads among Kagan's straight 'liberal' supporters. Even the queers are relieved, if advocate.com is any indication

"She just never met the right guy."

Well, neither has Mister Bates but that hasn't stopped him from tasting what's on offer.

Onward and upward. Now all we have to worry about is whether we can trust a 'straight' woman who doesn't believe there is a constitutional right to marriage equality. How relieved does that make YOU feel?

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

SEPARATED AT GIRTH: Kagan and Rekers Share A Crowded Closet



In five online pages wherein Elana Kagan's poker playing skills were mentioned three times, The New York Times had this to say about the closeted lesbian nominee for the Supreme Court, "Kagan has never married." And that tone of DADT has held across the Liberal Establishment who claim it doesn't matter, so shouldn't be discussed, but who KNOW that if it is discussed and Kagan is firmly outed her entire nomination is in jeopardy. Thus, The Times and their ilk ironically are discovering the narrow measure of the closet for themselves. As the first wave of people to "out" public figures realized, you can't keep the closet closed without locking yourself in there, too.

Truth will out. Meanwhile, the Obama-libs' fig leaf? Kagan has never self-identified as a lesbian. Just as she has never self-identified with a single politically weighted position in her entire career? It seems that this nominee has a fetish for opacity that might be worrying, even to cheerleaders like The New York Times. Her denial, vociferously reinforced by the White House, of what, in Cambridge circles, is the open secret of her lesbianism is part and parcel of the unnerving mystery that is Elana Kagan. Translation: HER CLOSETEDNESS MATTERS because it's emblematic of the subterfuges that dovetail in her entire CHARACTER.

Many gay politicos--not surprisingly Joe Solomonese of the Subhuman Rights Campaign among them--seem to have been enlisted in the "it shouldn't matter" conspiracy of silence around Kagan. The theory with them, and other Obama "liberals" being, let's just get her on the court and she'll be good to us.

THE SELF-LOATHING DYKE IN THE OINTMENT: a closeted queer is more dangerous to LGBT folks than a conservative straight. And we need look no further this week than the rich and deep ironies in the exposure of anti-gay/ex-gay Family Research Council founder George Reker as a repeat patron of Rentboy.com.

KAGAN IN THE CLOSET IS A DANGER TO LGBT PEOPLE and our struggle for equality. How's she going to treat our cases on the court if affirming our rights could expose her personal lie? And it makes sense to ask, if she hates her own queerness enough to deny it, how friendly will she be to the rest of us? Homophobia starts in the home closet and it's first victims are the ones who got away.

Mister Bates has a long memory, one that stretches back to former Congresswoman LIZ HOLTZMAN's visit to a rowdy ACTUP meeting in New York in the late 80s. She'd barely begun to talk before the dykes in the room started chanting "Come Out! Come Out! Come Out!" Liz fled the podium and the meeting. And she LOST whatever she was running for that had brought her to seek, shhh, queer votes. Sad Liz Holtzman, LESBIAN LOSER.

And what Baby Dyke spent the summer of 1980 trying to get Liz Holtzman elected to the Senate? Oh, yeah, ELANA KAGAN.

Sister Kagan, that ACTUP meeting hall is still echoing: COME OUT, COME OUT, COME OUT, COME OUT.

And it's still true, Elana: Your SILENCE EQUALS DEATH.

Saturday, May 1, 2010

WHO'S NOT READY FOR REPEAL? dadt ringing in soldiers ears


Days BEFORE the Dept. of Defense' big OLD boy, Robert Gates said repealing anti-gay bigotry in the military would "send a very damaging message to our men and women in uniform," soldier Aaron Melcher and his comrades in drag send a MAJOR VOICEMAIL in the form of their ultra brilliant Lady GaGa "Telephone" remake. (In a single week, they've already racked up 1.2 million views. Take THAT random sample, Obie!)


How many ways does this 3 minute video show that Gates, Obama, et al, have not got a CLUE what or who the 'men and women in uniform' are?

1. This is garage drag at its gayest level, regardless of who's cornholin who, or not, in Obama's sandy new Vietnam.

2. Melcher's a two-mommies man, proving that lesbians can too teach a boy to dance!

3. Gates and Obama are like props off the set of Mad Men, that's how anachronistic they are.

4. But if we have to be retro, reach back to Truman. He desegregated the military how? WITH AN ORDER. Gates and Obama are ball-less wonders. UNLIKE the straight-but-so-not-narrow Aaron Melcher who is wondrously 'free to be you and me.'

5. The only good news is the future is now. And it does NOT include Obamahower and his white boys can't jump administration.

Thanks, 'Malibu Milkshake Melcher.' You ring Mister Bates queer bell.